Save to workspace or export JSON before switching. Replacing a draft clears device-only saves after confirmation.
Structure issues, evidence, options and a reasoned professional position.
- Work towards
- Decision memorandum
What you will need — Advisory decision
- What decision or advice is required?
State the professional question in one sentence.
- Which facts are confirmed, disputed or assumed?
Keep evidence separate from inference.
- Which realistic options must be compared?
Include the consequences of doing nothing.
- What authority, policy or standard controls the analysis?
Add dates and jurisdiction where they matter.
Connect claims, chronology, evidence, procedure, scenarios and deadlines.
- Work towards
- Strategy and risk report
What you will need — Litigation strategy
- What outcome and decision horizon matter?
State commercial and procedural objectives.
- What is the current procedural posture?
Record forum, claims, defences and deadlines.
- Which evidence supports or contradicts each position?
Separate verified material from allegation and inference.
- Which strategic options and downside scenarios must be compared?
Include cost, timing and enforcement risk.
Map clauses, obligations, deviations, negotiation positions and residual risk.
- Work towards
- Redline and risk report
What you will need — Contract review
- Which agreement, parties and transaction are in scope?
Identify draft version and governing law.
- Which clauses and obligations need review?
Record clause references and owners.
- Which deviations or missing protections create risk?
Use the approved playbook as baseline.
- What wording and fallback positions are acceptable?
Separate must-have, preferred and accepted risk.
Compare lawful tax structures and their economics. Choose this for a tax position memorandum and an economic assessment.
- Work towards
- Tax position memorandum
What you will need — Tax planning
- Which entities, jurisdictions and flows are in scope?
Include residence, source and ownership facts.
- What lawful business purpose is being tested?
State the non-tax purpose and decision horizon.
- Which current rules and reporting duties apply?
Add authoritative HTTPS sources and effective dates.
- What baseline, alternative, cost and downside should be compared?
Use transparent rates, currency and assumptions.
Map obligations to controls, evidence, exceptions, owners and remediation.
- Work towards
- Gap and remediation plan
What you will need — Compliance assessment
- Which regime, entity and activity are assessed?
Define scope, owner, period and materiality.
- Which current obligations apply?
Record authority, jurisdiction and effective date.
- Which controls address each obligation?
Separate design from operating evidence.
- Which gaps, exceptions and actions remain?
Assign owners, target dates and residual risk.
Combine tax analysis with a compliance schedule for reporting, approvals, owners and effective dates.
- Work towards
- Tax position memorandum
What you will need — Tax & compliance
- Which entities, jurisdictions and cash flows are in scope?
Include residence, source and beneficial ownership facts.
- What lawful business or compliance purpose is being tested?
State the non-tax purpose and decision horizon.
- Which rules and reporting duties may apply?
Add authoritative HTTPS sources and a legal as-of date.
- What baseline, optimized case, cost and downside should be compared?
Use transparent rates, currency and assumptions.
- 07
ERP incident & solution
Capture the process failure, root cause, controls, solution and test evidence.
- Work towards
- Solution design & test pack
What you will need — ERP incident & solution
- What happened, where and with what business impact?
Include legal entity, module, process step, frequency and urgency.
- Which transactions, logs and reproductions prove the symptom?
Keep production facts separate from hypotheses.
- Which configuration, data, code or process causes are plausible?
Record eliminated causes as evidence too.
- How will the fix be tested, approved and monitored?
Define owner, test data, expected postings and rollback.
Preserve evidence, actors, chronology, contradictions, findings and unresolved matters.
- Work towards
- Findings and chronology report
What you will need — Investigation
- What is the mandate and scope?
State allegations, exclusions and decision authority.
- Which actors, systems and events matter?
Use stable identities and dates.
- Which evidence exists and how was it obtained?
Record chain of custody and limitations.
- What is supported, contradicted or unresolved?
Use the applicable standard of proof.
Build a deterministic branching route with decisions, pressure and outcomes.
- Work towards
- Playable scenario
What you will need — Training simulation
- Who is the learner and what role do they play?
Define experience level and decision authority.
- Which behavior or judgment should the simulation exercise?
Use observable learning objectives.
- What information, deadline and resource pressure shapes the choices?
Avoid a single obviously correct option.
- What should the debrief explain after each outcome?
Tie consequences to the learner's decisions.
Want a worked example first?Demo contains completed fictional cases to explore. Templates give you a starting structure for your own work.