CaseVantby Falcon-Merlin GroupChoose an example. Guided walkthroughs explain the workflow; worked Studio examples cover every case category; decision simulations let you make the choices.
Follow a business decision from source documents to a decision map and report. Compare four scenarios in a working copy.
Illustrative prompt: Compare expansion, a conditional 90-day pilot, deferral and decline. Identify the evidence and clearance needed before commitment; explain your preferred route.
Asteron Systems pursues its ERP supplier after a failed implementation, while scope changes, acceptance language, causation, evidence, deadlines, and layered remedies shape the result.
Illustrative prompt: Compare settlement and a claim after the ERP failure. Identify acceptance and causation evidence before choosing a remedy.
Editorial preview · v1.2.0
Author: GENESIS: JURIS
Legal review pending
Velmont Logistics seeks recovery of unpaid freight and warehousing invoices while Orbis Retail disputes service levels, detention charges, and contractual surcharges.
Illustrative prompt: Separate supported invoice amounts from disputed charges. Choose a recovery route and explain which delivery evidence you still need.
Editorial preview · v1.2.0
Author: GENESIS
Legal review pending
An industrial fire places a chemical-storage company under simultaneous criminal, regulatory, environmental, insurance, and insolvency pressure.
Illustrative prompt: Prioritize evidence preservation, regulatory response and insurance notice in the first 72 hours. Explain how you handle conflicting instructions.
Editorial preview · v0.4.0
Author: GENESIS: AI Juris
Legal review pending
A food-safety authority blocks twelve poultry farms after traces of an unauthorised pesticide are detected in eggs.
Illustrative prompt: Choose the first containment and recall actions. Trace affected products and explain what evidence supports your next decision.
Editorial preview · v0.3.0
Author: GENESIS: AI Juris
Legal review pending
Residents of Sundial Mesa suspect that hexavalent chromium from Caldera's cooling and compressor facility reached their wells.
Illustrative prompt: Assess the suspected contamination without assuming causation. Choose evidence-preservation steps and identify procedural questions requiring verification.
Editorial preview · v0.3.0
Author: GENESIS: AI Juris
Legal review pending
Loading worked examples…
Illustrative prompt: Fictional illustration: Harbor is considering a EUR 24,000, 60-day supplier pilot. Compare approval, renegotiation and deferral. Identify the missing acceptance criteria and the evidence needed to test the promised capacity benefit.
Work towards: Decision memorandum
After opening, choose Brief & structure → Edit the brief to adapt this prompt. Opening an example does not run AI.
Fictional dossier H-01: quote, scope and capacity worksheet. Quote is available; signed acceptance criteria remain missing.
Trace the decision to its evidence, compare both outcomes and review the expected output. Professional review remains required.
Illustrative prompt: Fictional illustration: Northline has EUR 48,000 in unpaid invoices; EUR 12,000 is disputed for delays. Compare settlement with a claim. List missing receipt evidence and the deadlines counsel must verify before a final demand.
Work towards: Strategy and risk report
After opening, choose Brief & structure → Edit the brief to adapt this prompt. Opening an example does not run AI.
Fictional dossier N-01: invoice ledger, dispatch log and disputed service-credit clause. Authenticity and applicable procedure need counsel review.
Trace the decision to its evidence, compare both outcomes and review the expected output. Professional review remains required.
Illustrative prompt: Fictional illustration: Cloudbridge's SaaS renewal costs EUR 36,000 annually. Review the restoration exclusion and missing data-export deadline. Propose negotiation priorities and identify residual risks requiring the service owner's acceptance.
Work towards: Redline and risk report
After opening, choose Brief & structure → Edit the brief to adapt this prompt. Opening an example does not run AI.
Fictional dossier C-01: clauses 8, 12 and 15, service-level schedule and procurement risk register. No redline has been agreed.
Trace the decision to its evidence, compare both outcomes and review the expected output. Professional review remains required.
Illustrative prompt: Fictional illustration: compare annual tax costs of EUR 100,000 and EUR 80,000 over 36 months, with EUR 25,000 implementation and EUR 5,000 annual maintenance. Assess net benefit and downside costs; flag unverified tax eligibility before recommending implementation.
Work towards: Tax position memorandum
After opening, choose Brief & structure → Edit the brief to adapt this prompt. Opening an example does not run AI.
Fictional dossier O-01: investment forecast and cost sheet. No authoritative tax source or jurisdiction review is attached.
Trace the decision to its evidence, compare both outcomes and review the expected output. Professional review remains required.
Illustrative prompt: Fictional illustration: two of Clearpath's three sampled supplier controls have approval records; the access review lacks sign-off. Draft a remediation plan with an owner, retest evidence and an activation gate. Distinguish policy requirements from operating evidence.
Work towards: Gap and remediation plan
After opening, choose Brief & structure → Edit the brief to adapt this prompt. Opening an example does not run AI.
Fictional dossier CP-01: control matrix, sample approvals and access log. A policy checklist alone is not operating evidence.
Trace the decision to its evidence, compare both outcomes and review the expected output. Professional review remains required.
Illustrative prompt: Fictional illustration: Meridian plans EUR 120,000 in annual intercompany service payments across two unspecified jurisdictions. Prepare a reporting-readiness checklist covering pricing support, allocation, local obligations and owners. Keep unknown deadlines and tax treatment unresolved pending local advice.
Work towards: Tax position memorandum
After opening, choose Brief & structure → Edit the brief to adapt this prompt. Opening an example does not run AI.
Fictional dossier M-01: service agreement, payment ledger and approval checklist. Pricing support and local sources remain missing.
Trace the decision to its evidence, compare both outcomes and review the expected output. Professional review remains required.
Illustrative prompt: Fictional illustration: Atlas batch B-17 posted 12 invoice lines twice after a retry. Propose containment, reconciliation and a repeatable retry test. Preserve original logs and treat the idempotency-key failure as a hypothesis until reproduced.
Work towards: Solution design & test pack
After opening, choose Brief & structure → Edit the brief to adapt this prompt. Opening an example does not run AI.
Fictional dossier A-01: batch log, duplicate ledger and retry trace. Preserve originals before applying corrections.
Trace the decision to its evidence, compare both outcomes and review the expected output. Professional review remains required.
Illustrative prompt: Fictional illustration: five Beacon expense claims share an approval screenshot whose timestamp conflicts with the export log. Separate supported findings from hypotheses, list provenance checks and request the original approval record. Do not infer intent from the discrepancy alone.
Work towards: Findings and chronology report
After opening, choose Brief & structure → Edit the brief to adapt this prompt. Opening an example does not run AI.
Fictional dossier B-01: original screenshot, export log and interview note. Verify provenance and maintain a chain-of-custody record.
Trace the decision to its evidence, compare both outcomes and review the expected output. Professional review remains required.
Illustrative prompt: Fictional illustration: Signal's import service is down and a restart may erase temporary logs. In Test → Play, choose a response, then explain which evidence supports recovery and which safeguards your route preserves or loses. Review the debrief before changing the scenario.
Work towards: Playable scenario
After opening, choose Brief & structure → Edit the brief to adapt this prompt. Opening an example does not run AI.
Fictional dossier S-01: alert, batch checkpoint and recovery checklist. The learner must choose a response before the debrief.
Trace the decision to its evidence, compare both outcomes and review the expected output. Professional review remains required.
In Studio, choose Test → Play to make decisions on the branching route.